South Korean citizens hold nightly candlelight vigils in front of the National Assembly, calling for the impeachment of President Yoon Suk-yeol. Initially dismissing the possibility of martial law as unlikely, they witnessed its declaration and subsequent failure, with President Yoon responding, ”What did I do wrong?” Now, concerns grow over the next step—a potential attempt at war. Many South Koreans say, ”Could war really happen?” but based on their experience with martial law, the prospect cannot be entirely dismissed. Photo by New Journalist Today.

In an extraordinary turn of events, Kim Min-seok, a key figure in South Korea’s Democratic Party, has issued a chilling warning: the possibility of a second, even third, martial law under President Yoon Suk Yeol. Speaking at a party meeting on Thursday (Seoul Time), Kim labeled Yoon a "mad dictator," accusing him of using emergency measures to crush opposition under the guise of national security.

​

From Speculation to Urgency

Kim’s initial remarks about potential martial law were met with skepticism and ridicule. However, as the political landscape shifts, his predictions are garnering serious attention. “Yoon’s defiance,” Kim argues, “is not the posture of a leader seeking reconciliation, but of one prepared to suppress dissent through any means necessary.”

​

The opposition's alarm is echoed by prominent voices within Yoon’s own party. Conservative figures like Kim Jong-hyuk, Supreme Council Member of the People Power Party, publicly questioned the rationale behind recent emergency declarations on Thursday. “What justification exists for such drastic measures?” Kim asked, signaling a growing fracture within the ruling party.

​

Rising Calls for Accountability

Jin Jong-oh, another prominent ruling party figure, took an even sharper tone, calling the martial law declarations a “fundamental betrayal of constitutional order.” While refraining from explicitly demanding Yoon’s resignation, Jin's rhetoric suggested dissatisfaction with the president’s leadership.

​

Even Han Dong-hoon, the People Power Party’s leader and a key ally of Yoon, criticized the measures, demanding accountability from military officials involved. However, Han stopped short of supporting impeachment, a stance that drew criticism for being overly cautious in a volatile moment.

​

Public Sentiment: A Shift in Conservative Strongholds

Recent polling reflects a seismic shift in public opinion. A survey by Realmeter revealed that 73.6% of respondents favor impeachment, including 50.4% of conservative voters. Traditional strongholds like Daegu and Gyeongsangbuk-do, once bastions of unwavering support, now exhibit majority support for impeachment. This dramatic change suggests that dissatisfaction with Yoon’s leadership transcends partisan lines.

​

The Specter of a Coup

Lee Jae-myung, leader of the Democratic Party, painted a dire picture of what could have transpired had Yoon's controversial directives been executed more efficiently. “Imagine if key military leaders had acted faster,” Lee speculated, warning of a potential “Yoon monarchy” where unchecked power would erode South Korea’s democratic foundations.

​

Adding to the drama, Cho Kuk, leader of the Innovation Party, echoed concerns about Yoon’s unpredictability. Citing his reliance on “superstitious advisors,” Cho warned that Yoon could escalate to actions as extreme as initiating conflict on the Korean Peninsula.

​

A Nation on Edge

South Korea faces an unprecedented crisis. The opposition's calls for impeachment are gaining traction, even as doubts linger about whether such measures could effectively constrain Yoon’s authoritarian tendencies. The specter of martial law, once relegated to the realm of political fiction, now looms as a terrifying possibility.

​

The implications extend far beyond domestic politics. Yoon’s unpredictable leadership, compounded by a reliance on advisors perceived as unaccountable, raises questions about South Korea’s stability in the eyes of its allies. The United States, notably absent from Yoon’s decision-making process during recent crises, may be reevaluating its trust in a key regional partner.

​

A Leadership Veiled in Mysticism and Peril

Observers point to the pervasive influence of mysticism within President Yoon’s inner circle as evidence that rational decision-making may not be his forte. This has led to speculation that war, once an implausible scenario, is now an increasingly tangible possibility. First Lady Kim Keon-hee, known for her decisive nature, is suspected of playing a significant role in the controversial imposition of martial law.

​

The inability to rein in this couple has become a critical concern. Many argue that immediate steps must be taken to suspend Yoon’s duties before the nation faces irreversible consequences.

​

The People Power Party’s steadfast support for Yoon has already led to extraordinary political chaos, including the unprecedented declaration of martial law and the potential arrest of the party’s own leader. Should a war erupt, this chaos would escalate into catastrophe—not only for the party but for the entire nation.

​

Han Dong-hoon, leader of the ruling party, today urged the public to place their trust in him. While Han is seen as a relatively rational figure within Yoon’s party, critics argue that trust is misplaced. Yoon, they contend, has seized the metaphorical steering wheel of a vehicle carrying 50 million passengers, driving it toward a precipice. His unilateral decision to impose martial law without even notifying key allies like the United States underscores the erratic and mysticism-driven nature of his leadership.

​

To some, this reliance on mystical advisors is not just an idiosyncrasy but a direct threat to national and regional stability.

​

The stakes could not be higher. If unchecked, Yoon’s actions may plunge the Korean Peninsula into chaos, THE WAR. In such a scenario, distinctions between Yoon’s supporters, his detractors, and even foreign nationals would become irrelevant. Everyone would be engulfed by the shared terror of war. In this moment of existential uncertainty, many are beginning to question if Yoon, not Kim Jong-un, poses the greater danger to peace in the Korean Peninsula.

​

The Road Ahead

South Korea’s political crisis underscores a fundamental question: can its democratic institutions withstand the pressures of authoritarianism? The answer will depend on whether the nation’s leaders, both in the opposition and within Yoon’s own party, can unite to prevent further erosion of democratic norms.

​

For now, South Korea stands at a crossroads, its future uncertain but its challenges unmistakably clear.